webslave wrote:If we had a whole lot of studies to confirm Dr Shoskes's findings that a small subset of men are cured with antibiotics and massage, I'd be more inclined to support that idea, but as it is, there are no confirmatory studies from believable and respected Western centers to back that up.
Just as there are currently no confirmatory studies to back up the use of
Quercetin other than Shoskes' original one
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entre ... s=10604689
Yet it works for some.
While I am very respectful of the work Shoskes has done, especially in the field of phytotherapy, he also has some work, such as this study, and his work on "nanobacteria", which is scientifically isolated, unsupported and unconfirmed.
Again, not unlike the study on
Quercetin. It may have been a double blind test but it was small and still remains the only one out there.
On the other hand, we have a number of big studies showing bacterial counts to be higher in controls and antibiotics to be useless... that is why this site will not allow the constant and obsessive discussion of infection that has dominated this area for decades without leading to any significant advances in treatment ("Dr" Song, Polacheck and Feliciano notwithstanding).
I have no intention of discussing infection because:
1) It's against the site rules and I respect those.
2) I think it's a fruitless discussion. There is evidence for and against but, ultimately, it comes down to what works for the individual. I certainly don't buy the theory that we're all infected with Chlamydia as that's clearly nonsense.
But enough. Like you say, this is not the place to discuss these theories.
Sleeper, unfortunately your operation was not an isolated experiment that allows you to make definite conclusions about whether it was key to your partial recovery or not.
Considering I wasn't doing anything else immediately after it, I felt a lot better and could pee about five times better I respectfully disagree.
Before undertaking the operation I downloaded every study on bladder neck incision and its efficacy so I thoroughly understood what to expect. The defining ones are these (I have the full articles, not the abstracts):
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entre ... s=12783172
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entre ... ds=7966675
You chose to use various other forms of treatment while recovering from the operation; any of these treatments could be the thing that helped you, especially
Quercetin, which in my case made at least a 30% difference to my symptoms.
I was using
Quercetin long before the operation. It did not help although admittedly it was a generic brand, not
Quercetin.
Where did you get that figure? Are you referring to the temporary anti-inflammatory effects antibiotics are well-known to have?
PMID: 17509180
The full article shows about 55% responding to antibiotics. This is a figure also quoted by other urologists. Remember, we're talking about the first few weeks to months of the syndrome. After that they're probably not going to help.
Now as to whether this is a syndrome with multiple causes or a single disease, this is my position: chronic prostatitis / chronic pelvic pain syndrome is a single disease, like migraine, that may have numerous triggers and exacerbating factors.
Again I respectively disagree. The symptoms are so wide and variable as are the treatments to suggest this to me.
Nobody here has fixated on any one treatment for this disease/syndrome, especially not me.
Not suggesting you are. You are fixated on what
isn't an effective treatment but with pretty good reason.
You'll see me recommending dietary modification, Elavil, ejaculation techniques, stress avoidance, quercetin, etc etc ... there is a long list of helpful strategies. However, I think the Stanford/Wise-Anderson Protocol, if you are able to access it, is the most useful place to start, and for most people who attend it forms the basis for a long-term recovery.
I agree although I don't think it has to be SP in particular.